There are actual laws being broken on the Democrat side of the fence, despite the desperate attempts to pin the blame and lay charges on the former president Trump for a range of arbitrary supposed activities.
One of these situations is the one involving Joe Biden’s son and the information on his now-famous laptop.
As stated in New York Magazine:
“When it [The laptop] first publicly surfaced, 20 days before the 2020 election, the authenticity of the material was doubted to the degree that Twitter and Facebook effectively banned the story from legitimate political discourse. Since then, mainstream news organizations, including the New York times and the Washington Post have come to verify that at least some of the information contained in the cache is authentic.”
“Hidden inside the laptop, according to those (almost exclusively on the right) who have reviewed the data or who trust the word of those who claim they have, is a corruption scandal that implicates not just Hunter but other members of the Biden family, including the president. The laptop details Hunter’s involvement with a Ukrainian natural-gas producer that paid him millions of dollars to serve on its board – the relationship at the center of Donald Trump’s first impeachment,” The magazine continues by listing other evidence found on the laptop.
Hunter Biden is currently under fire from a number of angles as the federal government reportedly has “sufficient evidence” to accuse him of tax violations.
“Initially, the investigation centered around Hunter Biden’s finances related to overseas business ties and consulting work. Over time, investigators with multiple agencies focused closely on whether he did not report all of his income, and whether he lied on gun purchase paperwork in 2018, according to the people familiar with the situation, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss an ongoing case,” The the Washington Post reported.
“Agents determined months ago they had assembled a viable criminal case against the younger Biden. But it is ultimately up to prosecutors at the Justice Department, not agents, to decide whether to file charges in cases where prosecutors believe the evidence is strong enough to lead to a likely conviction at trial,” The the Washington Post added.
On Monday’s “Mornings with Maria” on Fox Business, Rep. James Comer, R-Ky, the leading member of the House Oversight Committee, said emphatically that the president’s son Hunter Biden and brother Jim are likely to face criminal charges as a result of their actions while Biden was vice president.
Comer said :“We are confident they committed a crime, so this is very serious,” and added “I am very disappointed that mainstream media hasn’t picked up on this because this is a pretty sure indication that there was criminal activity.”
Hunter Biden was allegedly mentioned in at least 150 suspicious activity reports from at least four different banks, which Comer is confident will show the Bidens’ involvement. However, due to a change in policy, Comer’s committee has been unable to access the relevant records.
“We do know that prior to Joe Biden becoming president any member of Congress had access to suspicious activity reports,” stated Comer“One first rule change Joe Biden made when president was changes to that rule, so Republicans have been blocked from getting the answers as to what triggered those 150 suspicious activity reports. Remember that’s the banks, and there was more than one bank, that notified the federal government that ‘we believe our client has committed a crime.”
Comer stated that although his committee has been unable to determine what precipitated the reports, they still intend to ask the Department of the Treasury for them once more following the November election.
Comer’s committee will use subpoenas, if necessary, to elicit the reasons why banks suspected the then vice-son president’s and brother committed a crime, knowing that suspicious activity reports are never filed without bank-driven concern.
More on this story via The Republic Brief:
Comer said his committee has not been able to pinpoint what triggered the reports but they plan to request them again from the Department of the Treasury after the November election...CONTINUE READING…
